CORTICOCORTICAL CONNECTIONS BETWEEN VISUAL AREA-17 AND AREA-18A OF THE RAT STUDIED IN-VITRO - SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ORGANIZATION OF FUNCTIONAL SYNAPTIC RESPONSES
Lg. Nowak et al., CORTICOCORTICAL CONNECTIONS BETWEEN VISUAL AREA-17 AND AREA-18A OF THE RAT STUDIED IN-VITRO - SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ORGANIZATION OF FUNCTIONAL SYNAPTIC RESPONSES, Experimental Brain Research, 117(2), 1997, pp. 219-241
Much is known about the anatomy of corticocortical connections, yet li
ttle is known concerning their physiology. In order to have access to
the synaptic and temporal aspects of the activity elicited through cor
ticocortical connections, we developed an in vitro approach on slices
of rat visual cortex. We used extracellular recordings of field potent
ials combined with electrical stimulation to localise regions of areas
17 and 18a that are connected. We found that corticocortical connecti
ons between areas 17 and 18a can be preserved in 500 mu m thick slices
, with a focus of activity separated from the stimulating electrode by
1.5 mm to more than 3 mm. The potentials elicited in one area after s
timulation of its neighbour displayed fast events, corresponding to ac
tion potentials, and slow events, corresponding to synaptic potentials
. Intracellular recordings showed that the earliest synaptic responses
consisted of monosynaptic excitatory potentials. Measurement of respo
nse latency showed that axons involved in both feedforward and feedbac
k corticocortical connections are slowly conducting (0.3-0.8 m/s). Con
duction velocity for antidromically activated cells was not significan
tly different for the two sets of connections. In an attempt to establ
ish the spatial organisation of functional synaptic inputs, field pote
ntial recordings were performed in the different cortical layers and u
sed to establish current source density (CSD) graphs along the depth a
xis. The CSD maps obtained were found to be somewhat variable from one
case to another. It is suggested that this variability results from t
he use of electrical stimulation, which activates axons that are both
afferent and efferent to a given cortical area. The field potentials a
re therefore likely to contain responses that correspond to the activi
ty mediated by the intrinsic collaterals mixed in variable amount with
responses produced by corticocortical synapses. With this restriction
in mind, it is suggested that, after stimulation of the supragranular
layers, the functional synaptic inputs of feedforward connections are
concentrated in layer 4 and the bottom of layer 3, while those of fee
dback axons involve mainly the upper part of the supragranular layers.
The intrinsic collaterals of the neurones participating in corticocor
tical connections seem also to provide the bulk of their inputs to the
upper part of the supragranular layers. The laminar pattern of activi
ty obtained after infragranular layer stimulation was comparable to th
at obtained after supragranular layer stimulation, except for the addi
tion of a supplementary region of activated synapses in the infragranu
lar layers.