M. Benitez et al., A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF POLICOSANOL VERSUS PRAVASTATIN IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE-II HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA, Current therapeutic research, 58(11), 1997, pp. 859-867
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Medicine, Research & Experimental
This randomized, double-masked study compared the short-term efficacy
and tolerability of policosanol and pravastatin in patients with type
II hypercholesterolemia. After following a step I cholesterol-lo werin
g diet for 6 weeks, 24 patients with type II hypercholesterolemia were
randomly assigned to receive policosanol or pravastatin administered
at the same dose (10 mg/d) for 6 weeks. Both groups mere statistically
similar at randomization. Policosanol significantly reduced total cho
lesterol (15.7%), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (24.2%), a
nd triglycerides (8.7%), as web as the atherogenic ratios of total cho
lesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (25.7%), and LD
L cholesterol to HDL cholesterol (33.0%). Pravastatin significantly lo
wered total cholesterol by 15.3%, LDL cholesterol by 19.6%, triglyceri
des by 13.9%, and the atherogenic ratios of total cholesterol to HDL c
holesterol (18.7%) and LDL cholesterol to HDL cholesterol (22.8%). Mea
n values of HDL cholesterol mere significantly increased by 13.6% afte
r treatment with policosanol, and were increased by 4.7% after treatme
nt with pravastatin. Comparisons between groups showed that the percen
tage change in LDL and HDL cholesterol levels, and in atherogenic rati
os were significantly higher in the policosanol group than in the prav
astatin group. Both drugs were well tolerated. A significant increase
in mean aspartate aminotransferase level was observed in the pravastat
in group, but individual values remained within the normal range. No p
atient withdrew from the study because of adverse events. Four moderat
e adverse events (nausea, dizziness, abdominal pain, and pruritus) wer
e reported by pravastatin-treated patients. The other adverse events r
eported (five in each group) were classified as mild. These results su
ggest that both policosanol and pravastatin are suitable alternatives
for treating type II hypercholesterolemia, but that policosanol admini
stered at 10 mg/d shows modest advantages compared with pravastatin ad
ministered at the same dose.