RELATION BETWEEN THE TIME TO ACHIEVE THE LOWER LIMIT OF THE APTT THERAPEUTIC RANGE AND RECURRENT VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM DURING HEPARIN TREATMENT FOR DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS
Rd. Hull et al., RELATION BETWEEN THE TIME TO ACHIEVE THE LOWER LIMIT OF THE APTT THERAPEUTIC RANGE AND RECURRENT VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM DURING HEPARIN TREATMENT FOR DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS, Archives of internal medicine, 157(22), 1997, pp. 2562-2568
Background: Randomized-trials have demonstrated the importance of achi
eving adequate heparinization early in the course of therapy. Recently
, some authors reported a pooled analysis of selected studies in the l
iterature that suggested that there is no convincing evidence that the
risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism is critically dependent on a
chieving a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time result at
24 to 48 hours. Methods: We provide the analyses of patient groups en
tered into our series of 3 consecutive double-blind randomized trials
evaluating initial heparin therapy for proximal deep venous thrombosis
. Results: logistic regression analysis of the patient groups receivin
g the less intense initial intravenous heparin dose of 30000 U/24 h de
monstrated that subtherapy for 24 hours predicted the onset of venous
thromboembolic events. Failure to achieve a therapeutic activated part
ial thromboplastin time by 24 hours was associated with a 23.3% freque
ncy of venous thromboembolism vs 4% to 6% for those whose activated pa
rtial thromboplastin time exceeded the therapeutic threshold by 24 hou
rs (P=.02). Time-to-event analysis shows the increased frequency of re
current venous thromboembolic events during the period of study in pat
ients who were subtherapeutic for 24 hours compared with those who wer
e therapeutic (P=.001). Conclusions: Our findings reaffirm the clinica
l importance of rapidly achieving therapeutic levels of heparin. Patie
nts who failed to achieve the therapeutic threshold by 24 hours were a
t an increased risk of subsequent recurrent venous thromboembolism The
se findings are independently supported by the results of a randomized
trial comparing different intensities of initial heparin treatment by
continuous infusion.