HOW LONG SHOULD PINDOLOL BE ASSOCIATED WITH PAROXETINE TO IMPROVE THEANTIDEPRESSANT RESPONSE

Citation
R. Zanardi et al., HOW LONG SHOULD PINDOLOL BE ASSOCIATED WITH PAROXETINE TO IMPROVE THEANTIDEPRESSANT RESPONSE, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 17(6), 1997, pp. 446-450
Citations number
19
ISSN journal
02710749
Volume
17
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
446 - 450
Database
ISI
SICI code
0271-0749(1997)17:6<446:HLSPBA>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
A double-blind study was undertaken to investigate the period of treat ment with the beta-adrenoreceptor/5-hydroxytryptamine 1A (5-HT1A) anta gonist pindolol required to enhance the antidepressant effects of paro xetine. After 1 meek of a placebo run-in period, 63 untreated major de pressive inpatients mere randomly assigned to three different groups. Group 1 received paroxetine (20 mg/day) plus placebo (4 weeks). Group 2 received paroxetine (20 mg/day) plus pindolol (7.5 mg/day) for 1 mee k and placebo for 3 weeks. Group 3 received both active treatments for the entire duration of the study (4 weeks). Clinical response was def ined as a reduction of the score in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depr ession (HAM-D) to 8 or below. Also, to preliminarily examine whether b eta-adrenoreceptor blockade was involved in the action of pindolol, an other group of 10 inpatients was treated in an open-label manner with paroxetine (20 mg/day) plus 50 mg/day of the beta-adrenergic antagonis t metoprolol, devoid of significant affinity for 5-HT1A receptors. At- endpoint, the incidence of treatment-emergent side effects did not sig nificantly differ among the three groups. After 1 and 2 weeks of treat ment, the two groups treated with paroxetine plus pindolol displayed a significantly greater response rate than the group treated with parox etine plus placebo. At study completion, only the patients treated wit h pindolol for the entire period showed a significantly greater respon se rate (p = 0.05). HAM-D scores mere also significantly lower at endp oint in patients treated with the combination for 4 weeks (p = 0.00003 ). The group of patients treated with paroxetine and metoprolol exhibi ted a side-effect profile comparable to that of paroxetine alone. Resp onse rates mere also comparable. These findings support the efficacy o f pindolol, but not of metoprolol, in accelerating the antidepressant effect of paroxetine and suggest that the administration of pindolol f or the entire period of the acute treatment may increase the efficacy of paroxetine.