The emergence of ''molecular epidemiology'' as a scientific approach w
ithin the fields of epidemiology and toxicology has led to spirited di
scussion within the biomedical community, particularly in the area of
cancer research, At scientific meetings and in peer-reviewed journals,
numerous issues have been raised not only with regard to the practice
of molecular epidemiology, but also with regard to its role in tradit
ional epidemiology, toxicology, and risk assessment, Furthermore, the
utility of information gleaned from such studies and the implications
for public health have been the subject of considerable debate, Concep
tual differences in how one views the function of epidemiologic and la
boratory research may be reflected in discussions on the merits of mol
ecular epidemiology, This commentary reviews some of the prevailing at
titudes toward molecular epidemiology, with the goal of identifying ar
eas of concern and suggesting means of achieving harmonization. The ne
ed for cross-training of epidemiologists and laboratory scientists is
discussed, and suggestions are made for building successful collaborat
ive relations across disciplines.