Dl. Weeks et al., A COMPARISON OF IMITATION STRATEGIES IN OBSERVATIONAL-LEARNING OF ACTION PATTERNS, Journal of motor behavior, 28(4), 1996, pp. 348-358
The effects of different arrangements of demonstration and imitation o
f modeled actions on the learning of the 26 handshapes of the American
manual alphabet were investigated. A concurrent group (N = 16), which
imitated handshapes concurrently with their demonstration, was compar
ed with a delayed group (N = 16), which delayed imitation until 3 hand
shapes had been displayed, and with a combination group (N = 16), whic
h practiced under a combination of concurrent conditions early in acqu
isition and delayed conditions later in acquisition. Following acquisi
tion, learning was assessed by means of immediate and long-term recall
and recognition tests. The delayed group was superior to the concurre
nt group in long-term serial recall and in immediate and long-term rec
ognition of 3-letter sequences (in nonserial order); the performance o
f the combination group was between those of the delayed and concurren
t groups. Therefore, delaying imitation in acquisition required subjec
ts to expend more cognitive effort to retain and produce handshapes wh
en requested than did concurrent imitation. This was beneficial to dev
elopment of task knowledge that could be relied on for postacquisition
recall and recognition of handshapes.