Purpose: Conventional myelography involves side effects and complicati
ons due to puncture of CSF space and injection of contrast medium. On
the other hand, MR-myelography (MRM)? is a new noninvasive method requ
iring neither puncture nor contrast medium and causing no side effects
. The diagnostic value and accuracy of MRM was evaluated in comparison
with conventional myelography. Materials and Methods: In this prospec
tive comparative study, 41 patients (17 male, 74 female, mean age 42 y
ears) with radicular symptoms underwent conventional lumbar myelograph
y and were also submitted to MRM. Evaluation was performed in a blind
manner by two independent examiners. Results: The specificity and sens
itivity of tile methods are identical. MRM shows 35 cases of thecal in
dentation with amputation of a nerve root sheath and 6 cases of spinal
stenosis. The results of conventional myelography and MRM were surgic
ally confirmed in 38 patients. Conclusions: Both methods have the same
diagnostic accuracy, but MRM requires neither puncture nor contrast m
edium nor x-rays.