Since a century evolution has mostly been interpreted by two simple, '
'opposite'' kinds of ''theories'' - i. e. as due either to fitness dif
ferences among genotypes or to some other simple mechanism - while bon
a fide, more complex theories were less popular throughout. In particu
lar by far the most complete theories ever produced were suddenly, alm
ost universally abandoned just after World War II, though not as a con
sequence of major breakthroughs. The muses of this situation are exami
ned by analogy with much earlier developments and their demise by Cart
esianism. The down to earth solutions these ''complete'' theories prov
ide to the problems of ''speciation'' and the origins of cells are con
trasted with the ''miraculous'' approaches by systemic neo-Darwinists.