C. Javierre et al., IS THE POST-LUNCH DIP IN SPRINTING PERFORMANCE ASSOCIATED WITH THE TIMING OF FOOD INGESTION, Journal of physiology and biochemistry, 52(4), 1996, pp. 247-253
To detect whether the drop in performance around lunch has any direct
association with the time of food ingestion, a group of 8 sprinters we
re studied for 5 consecutive Saturdays. On each testing day, the times
achieved during 80 meter sprints performed at eight different times o
f the day separated by 2 hour intervals were recorded. The Ist and 4th
testing days, had identical sleep and mealtime schedules, and were th
erefore considered ''control days'', while on the 2nd and 3rd resting
days the schedule was brought forward (''advanced'') or backward (''de
layed'') by 2 hours respectively. On the 5th testing day the sleep-wak
e cycle was brought forward 2 hours without changing the mealtime sche
dule. A post-lunch dip (PLD) was detected on all testing days although
at different times. No significant differences in performance were ob
served between days 1 and 4 while there were differences in performanc
e during the other testing days. It is worth pointing out that PLD occ
urred at about 15:00 h on the control days, with significant differenc
es between the 2nd (p < 0.05) and 3rd days (p < 0.05), and with the de
terioration in performance starting at 15:00 h on the 3rd day despite
the fact that lunch had been served at 16:00 h. In conclusion, PLD doe
s not appear to be directly linked to the time of lunch, although lunc
h itself could potentiate its effects. It is also worth mentioning the
fact that this deteriorating effect does not occur after any other me
als of the day.