Among the numerous scores available for the quantitative evaluation of
injury severity, only few have proved themselves effective in clinica
l practice. The ''Revised Trauma Score'' - based on physiological vari
ables - is the most widespread in preclinical use. The ''Injury Severi
ty Score'' - based on anatomical data - is the most accepted for defin
ed indices. However, a combination of the two, known as the ''Trauma a
nd Injury Severity Score (TRISS)'', represents an international standa
rd for quality control. Recent experience with TRISS in central Europe
has shown that an increasing number of patients cannot be registered
due to missing data. One reason for this is the intense preclinical tr
eatment and its, influence on physiological variables. The practicabil
ity of this method for quality control - combined with additional effo
rts - must be questioned in Germany. A score system based, for example
, on the obligatory score of the ''International Classification of Dis
eases'', might be a good alternative with less effort required for eac
h patient. Further investigations are necessary, however, before any f
inal decisions are made.