Fj. Flossdorf et al., FATIGUE-STRENGTH OF WEATHERING STRUCTURAL -STEELS AFTER MANY GEARS OFATMOSPHERIC EXPOSURE, Stahl und Eisen, 117(11), 1997, pp. 105
Objective. Weathering structural steels, which in bare condition displ
ay elevated resistance to atmospheric corrosion compared with unalloye
d steels, are used preferably in steel structures and, in particular,
in bridge construction as they present economic and maintenance-relate
d advantages. However, there have been concerns that their fatigue str
ength might be diminished because of the corrosion process. Thus arose
the task of gathering quantitative data concerning the relationship b
etween fatigue strength and the influence of long-term weathering. Sum
mary. In a cooperative effort between four German steel companies and
Fraunhofer-Institut fur Betriebsfestig- keit (LBF) in Darmstadt, the f
atigue behaviour of test pieces of general-purpose structural steel S3
55J2G3 (St 52-3) and weathering structural steel S355J2G1W (WTSt 52-3)
exposed atmospherically at two industrial locations for up to 20 year
s was determined as a function of the test piece form (non-welded, wel
ded) and duration of exposure. The fatigue strength of the non-welded
test pieces decreases by as much as 30 % within a two-year atmospheric
exposure period (and by as much as 35 % over exposure periods up to 2
0 years), in which respect the weathering structural steel has at all
times exhibited less corrosion than the general-purpose structural ste
el. The fatigue behaviour of welded test pieces is more important for
the dimensional design of components. The stress permissible for shape
d elements such as butt-joints and transverse stiffeners remains indep
endent of the duration of atmospheric exposure. The reason for this is
that the influence of the corrosion is masked by the fatigue-strength
-diminishing effect of the undercuts made during welding. The results
of the research help to provide robuster calculations for structures b
uilt of weathering structural steel, including cases involving alterna
ting stress. The current rules on approval and dimensional design do n
ot uniformly and adequately take account of the fatigue behaviour as a
function of the exposure duration.