Hematopoietic growth factors allow dose escalation of chemotherapy. Th
is approach may potentially reduce the quality and quantity of hematop
oietic stem cells. The capacity of stem cells recovered after dose int
ensification to support myeloablative therapy is unknown. In patients
with previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma, trilineage hem
atopoietic engraftment was compared in two sequential trials of induct
ion therapy (standard dose cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine.
prednisone [CHOP] without growth factors or dose intensification CHOP
supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]) followed
by identical myeloablative therapy and autologous stem cell support. N
eutrophil, platelet, and red blood cell (RBC) engraftment were compare
d on days 100, 180, and 360 after stem cell reinfusion. Despite simila
r patient characteristics including reinfusion of comparable numbers o
f marrow mononuclear cells, after stem cell transplantation. a highly
significant prolongation of neutrophil and platelet engraftment was se
en in patients who received high dose CHOP and G-CSF in comparison to
standard dose CHOP. These findings suggest that dose intensified chemo
therapy and G-CSF recruited stem cells into a proliferative phase and
that G-CSF allowed retreatment at a time when stem cells were suscepti
ble to damage by cytotoxic therapy. Such inadequate hematologic engraf
tment after myeloablative therapy might be avoided by either shortenin
g the time that growth factor support is administered, lengthening the
interval between cycles, or attempting to repetitively harvest additi
onal stem cells either from the marrow or peripheral blood. Therefore,
intensification of chemotherapy with growth factor support must be us
ed with caution if stem cells are to be used to support myeloablative
therapy. (C) 1997 by The American Society of Hematology.