Tt. Nguyen et al., EFFECT OF METHOHEXITONE AND PROPOFOL WITH OR WITHOUT ALFENTANIL ON SEIZURE DURATION AND RECOVERY IN ELECTROCONVULSIVE-THERAPY, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 79(6), 1997, pp. 801-803
We have studied the effects of methohexitone and propofol with and wit
hout alfentanil on seizure duration and recovery in this observer-blin
ded, prospective, randomized, crossover study involving 24 patients un
dergoing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Each patient had four treatm
ent sessions, and received the following four i.v. regimens in random
order: methohexitone 0.75 mg kg(-1), methohexitone 0.50 mg kg(-1) and
alfentanil 10 mu g kg(-1), propofol 0.75 mg kg(-1), propofol 0.50 mg k
g(-1) and alfentanil 10 mu g kg(-1) Additional methohexitone or propof
ol was given as needed in 10-20-mg increments until loss of consciousn
ess. Suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg(-1) i.v. was given for muscular paralysis
. Mean motor and EEG seizure durations were longer with methohexitone-
alfentanil (44.7 (SD 15.0) and 70.5 (29.7) s) than with methohexitone
(37.6 (12.6) and 52.6 (15.3) s) and similarly, seizures were longer wi
th propofol-alfentanil (36.8 (15.2) and 54.5 (20.9) s) than alone prop
ofol alone (27.2 (11.9) and 39.2 (3.9) s). Seizures were longest with
methohexitone-alfentanil and shortest with propofol. Recovery time was
statistically shorter in patients receiving propofol compared with me
thohexitone-alfentanil and methohexitone alone. Alfentanil with a redu
ced dose of methohexitone or propofol provided unconsciousness and inc
reased seizure duration in patients undergoing ECT. We conclude that t
he combination of methohexitone with alfentanil is a good regimen for
ECT, especially for patients with short seizure duration.