The interplay between agency and structure explains a scientist's read
iness to disclose information about research efforts. In a survey of 6
28 Israeli researchers, personal strategies in the pursuit of collegia
l appreciation were influenced by conflicting value guidelines at diff
erent time-space frameworks for scientific work. When researchers enco
untered the value of communality, they were encouraged to communicate
freely to obtain community recognition. When a greater stress was plac
ed on universalism, restricting communication became a reasonable stra
tegy to protect acknowledgment rights. The influence of universalism w
as intensified when researchers inferred a structural vulnerability be
cause of exposure to contextual conditions that increased the possibil
ity of losing acknowledgment. A balanced impact of the two values-comm
unality and universalism-may be postulated as contributing to a more r
apid development of the scientific enterprise.