N. Krieger et al., CAN WE MONITOR SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITIES IN HEALTH - A SURVEY OF US HEALTH DEPARTMENTS DATA-COLLECTION AND REPORTING PRACTICES, Public health reports, 112(6), 1997, pp. 481-491
Objective. To evaluate the potential for and obstacles to routine moni
toring of socioeconomic inequalities in health using U.S. vital statis
tics and disease registry data, the authors surveyed current data coll
ection and reporting practices for specific socioeconomic variables. M
ethods. In 1996 the authors mailed a seif-administered survey to all o
f the 55 health department vital statistics offices reporting data to
the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) to determine what kin
ds of socioeconomic data they collected on birth and death certificate
s and in cancer, AIDS, and tuberculosis (TB) registries and what kinds
of socioeconomic data were routinely reported in health department pu
blications. Results. Health departments routinely obtained data on occ
upation on death certificates and in most cancel-registries. They coll
ected data on educational level for both birth and death certificates.
None of the databases collected information on income, and few obtain
ed data on employment status, health insurance carrier, or receipt of
public assistance. When socioeconomic data were collected, they were u
sually not included in published reports (except for mothers education
al level in birth certificate data). Obstacles cited to collecting and
reporting socioeconomic data included lack of resources and concerns
about the confidentiality and accuracy of data. All databases, however
, included residential addresses: suggesting records could be geocoded
and linked to Census-based socioeconomic data. Conclusions. U.S. stat
e and Federal vital statistics and disease registries should routinely
collect and publish socioeconomic data to improve efforts to monitor
trends in and reduce social inequalities in health.