H. Leyh et E. Mazeman, BARD(R)BTA(R) TEST COMPARED WITH VOIDED URINE CYTOLOGY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF RECURRENT BLADDER-CANCER, European urology, 32(4), 1997, pp. 425-428
Objective: To compare the Bard(R) BTA(R) (bladder tumour antigen) test
with voided urine cytology (VUC) in the diagnosis of recurrent bladde
r cancer (BC). Methods: Urine specimens for the BTA test and VUC were
collected on the same day as before cystoscopy from patients undergoin
g routine surveillance cystoscopy for recurrent BC. The pathologists p
erforming VUC were blinded to the results of the BTA test. Results: BC
was identified by cystoscopy and biopsy in 39 of 164 study participan
ts. The overall sensitivities of the BTA test and VUC were 54 and 28%,
respectively (p < 0.05). The BTA test was more sensitive than VUC for
all tumour stages and grades. For greater than or equal to T-2 tumour
s and grade 3 tumours, respectively, the difference was statistically
significant (p < 0.05). The specificities of the BTA test and VUC were
92 and 97%, respectively. Both a false-positive BTA test and VUC were
found to predict recurrence. Conclusion: The BTA test is equal or sup
erior to VUC in the detection of BC in patients undergoing routine sur
veillance for recurrent BC.