BARD(R)BTA(R) TEST COMPARED WITH VOIDED URINE CYTOLOGY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF RECURRENT BLADDER-CANCER

Authors
Citation
H. Leyh et E. Mazeman, BARD(R)BTA(R) TEST COMPARED WITH VOIDED URINE CYTOLOGY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF RECURRENT BLADDER-CANCER, European urology, 32(4), 1997, pp. 425-428
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
03022838
Volume
32
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
425 - 428
Database
ISI
SICI code
0302-2838(1997)32:4<425:BTCWVU>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Objective: To compare the Bard(R) BTA(R) (bladder tumour antigen) test with voided urine cytology (VUC) in the diagnosis of recurrent bladde r cancer (BC). Methods: Urine specimens for the BTA test and VUC were collected on the same day as before cystoscopy from patients undergoin g routine surveillance cystoscopy for recurrent BC. The pathologists p erforming VUC were blinded to the results of the BTA test. Results: BC was identified by cystoscopy and biopsy in 39 of 164 study participan ts. The overall sensitivities of the BTA test and VUC were 54 and 28%, respectively (p < 0.05). The BTA test was more sensitive than VUC for all tumour stages and grades. For greater than or equal to T-2 tumour s and grade 3 tumours, respectively, the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The specificities of the BTA test and VUC were 92 and 97%, respectively. Both a false-positive BTA test and VUC were found to predict recurrence. Conclusion: The BTA test is equal or sup erior to VUC in the detection of BC in patients undergoing routine sur veillance for recurrent BC.