ALDESLEUKIN (RECOMBINANT INTERLEUKIN-2) - A REVIEW OF ITS PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES, CLINICAL EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA
W. Jeal et Kl. Goa, ALDESLEUKIN (RECOMBINANT INTERLEUKIN-2) - A REVIEW OF ITS PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES, CLINICAL EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA, Biodrugs, 7(4), 1997, pp. 285-317
Aldesleukin (recombinant interleukin-2), like endogenous interleukin-2
(IL-2), has a variety of immunomodulatory properties. It is currently
approved for intravenous use in patients with renal cell carcinoma, i
n whom it appears to have an indirect antitumour effect mediated by in
creased activity of the host's immune system. A large number of clinic
al trials (typically noncomparative) have established the efficacy of
aldesleukin monotherapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Respons
e rates of 13 to 20% achieved after intravenous administration and 18
to 31% after subcutaneous administration are greater than those previo
usly reported (perpendicular to 10%) for other chemo- and immunotherap
eutic agents. Furthermore, many patients who were previously refractor
y to treatment have achieved stable disease status or better after ald
esleukin therapy. Median survival times of at least 37 months have bee
n achieved and perhaps more encouraging is an isolated report of a 5-y
ear actuarial survival rate of 23%. Bolus intravenous administration o
f aldesleukin was associated with frequent, and occasionally life-thre
atening, adverse events. Hypotension and renal, pulmonary and cardiac
complications were primarily manifestations of increased vascular perm
eability. Symptoms were generally manageable with treatment interrupti
on and standard pharmaceutical and/or clinical intervention, although
some treatment-related deaths were reported. The severity of adverse e
vents was reduced with continuous infusion of the agent and more subst
antially so when aldesleukin was administered subcutaneously. In concl
usion, despite a lack of comparative and phase III trials, aldesleukin
therapy appears to result in a slightly better response rate than tho
se previously reported with other antineoplastic therapies in this dif
ficult-to-treat patient population. Retrospective data indicate that s
urvival duration may be moderately increased by aldesleukin, but furth
er prospective comparative data are required before this may be proven
. In view of the poor prognosis associated with renal cell carcinoma,
efficacy data from clinical trials evaluating aldesleukin, together wi
th the potential for reducing adverse events by changing its route of
administration, suggest the drug may be a worthwhile therapy for patie
nts with this disease.