COMPARISON OF ONDANSETRON AND DROPERIDOL IN THE PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN WOMEN - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL
M. Koivuranta et al., COMPARISON OF ONDANSETRON AND DROPERIDOL IN THE PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN WOMEN - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 41(10), 1997, pp. 1273-1279
Background: Women undergoing laparoscopic surgery are susceptible to p
ostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Ondansetron and droperidol ar
e useful antiemetics. This study was designed to ascertain primarily t
he relative difference in efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol and s
econdarily between these drugs and placebo in the prevention of PONV a
fter laparoscopic surgery. Methods: The prophylactic antiemetic effica
cy of ondansetron and droperidol was compared in a prospective, random
ised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 439 female inpatients
scheduled for laparoscopic surgery. During induction of standardised g
eneral anaesthesia the patients received intravenously either ondanset
ron 8 mg (n=195), droperidol 1.25 mg (n=193) or placebo (n=51). The oc
currence of nausea, vomiting, side-effects and the need for rescue ant
iemetic medication were recorded for 24 h postoperatively. Results: Th
e proportion of patients with nausea was 48%, 50% and 67% in the ondan
setron, droperidol and placebo groups, respectively; with a significan
t difference when both ondansetron (P=0.02) and droperidol (P=0.04) we
re compared with placebo. Vomiting occurred in 18%, 26% and 37% of the
patients in the three groups, respectively (P=0.05 between ondansetro
n and droperidol, P=0.004 between ondansetron and placebo, P=0.16 betw
een droperidol and placebo). The proportion of patients given rescue m
edication was 34%, 28% and 49%, respectively (P=0.23 for ondansetron a
nd droperidol, P=0.07 for ondansetron and placebo, P=0.007 for droperi
dol and placebo). During early recovery the patients treated with onda
nsetron were significantly more alert than after droperidol. Serious s
ide-effects were not observed. Headache was significantly more common
after ondansetron than after droperidol treatment. Conclusions: The ef
ficacy of prophylactic ondansetron and droperidol in reducing postoper
ative nausea associated with laparoscopic surgery in female inpatients
was similar, but ondansetron appeared to be slightly more efficient t
han droperidol in preventing vomiting. Ondansetron and droperidol were
both significantly better than placebo in the prophylaxis of PONV.