A. Vogel et al., FACTORS DETERMINING THE REFRACTIVE EFFECTS OF INTRASTROMAL PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY WITH THE PICOSECOND LASER, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 23(9), 1997, pp. 1301-1310
Purpose: To determine the relationship between laser parameters and ti
ssue removal with picosecond laser intrastromal photorefractive kerate
ctomy (ISPRK) and to assess the effect of the parameters on the healin
g process and the long-term refractive changes. Setting: Medical Laser
Center Lubeck, Germany. Methods: A modified Intelligent Surgical Lase
rs (ISL) 2001 system with a cone angle of 30 degrees was used for in v
itro investigations of the laser effects in water and on the porcine c
ornea. Photographic methods were used to determine the plasma volume a
nd to investigate the thickness of the intrastromal bubble layer as a
function of the laser pulse energy, the number of layers in which the
pulses were applied, and the layer separation. The data were used to c
alculate the amount of tissue removal. Histologic evaluation was done
by polarization microscopy after Sirius-red staining. Results: The las
er pulses produced a sponge-like appearance of the stroma in a layer e
xtending through about one third the corneal thickness, accompanied by
mechanical distortions of the stromal lamellae. Thermal changes were
weak. Tissue removal was impaired by the cavitation bubbles from prece
ding laser pulses: The amount of evaporated tissue depended only weakl
y on laser pulse energy and number of layers in which the pulses were
applied. The maximum amount of tissue that could be evaporated without
damaging the outer corneal layers was a 10.0 mu m thick layer. With a
6.0 mm optical zone, the tissue removal produced an immediate refract
ive effect of only 0.85 diopter. Conclusions: Intrastromal PRK does no
t work as originally envisioned because the amount of evaporated tissu
e is very small. The greater long-term refractive changes observed in
animal experiments and clinical studies must therefore be due to the h
ealing response of the cornea. Because the refractive effects are stro
ngly influenced by the healing response of the cornea, they are poorly
predictable.