M. Heikkinen et al., USEFULNESS OF ANTI-HELICOBACTER PYLORI AND ANTI-CAGA ANTIBODIES IN THE SELECTION OF PATIENTS FOR GASTROSCOPY, The American journal of gastroenterology, 92(12), 1997, pp. 2225-2229
Objectives: Screening of dyspeptic patients with serological tests for
Helicobacter pylori before open-access gastroscopy has been suggested
to be worthwhile. CagA-positive H. pylori strains may be associated w
ith major pathology more often than CagA-negative strains. The usefuln
ess of anti-H. pylori and anti-CagA antibodies in screening for gastro
scopy was evaluated in unselected dyspeptic patients. Methods: Four hu
ndred consecutive, unselected dyspeptic patients (mean age, 56.8 yr) i
n primary care were investigated with gastroscopy, ultrasonography of
the upper abdomen, laboratory tests (including serological tests for H
. pylori and CagA), and other examinations if needed. The patients wer
e followed for 1 yr. Results: Results of serological tests were positi
ve for H. pylori in 56.2% of patients, of whom 64.4% also had results
positive for CagA. Use of H. pylori and CagA serology-based screening
combined with a history of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use wou
ld have detected only 80 and 70% of the major pathologies (peptic ulce
r, moderate or severe esophagitis, celiac disease, or malignancy), res
pectively, in these patients. Gastroscopy would have been avoided in 3
0 and 41%, respectively, if only patients who had positive results on
serological tests or who were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug user
s would have been referred. In patients younger than 45 yr of age (n =
87), 60-74% of gastroscopies would have been avoided, but 50-60% of m
ajor pathologies would have been missed, by using the screening strate
gy studied. One of the nine malignancies (all in patients >45 yr of ag
e) was H. pylori-negative, and two were CagA-negative. Conclusions: An
ti-CagA antibodies do not offer advantages compared with anti-H. pylor
i antibodies in screening patients for gastroscopy. A remarkable share
of major pathologies are missed by both of these screening methods. T
herefore, the results of these screening tests are not recommended as
selective criteria for gastroscopy.