A. Schinzel et al., TRISOMY FIRST, TRANSLOCATION 2ND, UNIPARENTAL DISOMY AND PARTIAL TRISOMY 3RD - A NEW MECHANISM FOR COMPLEX CHROMOSOMAL ANEUPLOIDY, European journal of human genetics, 5(5), 1997, pp. 308-314
A 2-year-old, short, microcephalic and developmentally retarded boy re
vealed a pattern of multiple minor anomalies, hypospadias and a dyspla
stic right kidney, Maternal age at delivery was 41 years. His karyotyp
e showed two cell lines, one apparently normal, the other with a 1p+ c
hromosome. FISH examinations showed that the segment attached to Ip wa
s from chromosome 16, and molecular investigations disclosed maternal
heterodisomy 16, except for the segment (16)(pter-->p13.1) for which t
here was mosaicism between trisomy and uniparental disomy (UPD). Most
likely, the zygote was trisomic for chromosome 16 due to a maternal me
iosis I nondisjunction; a somatic rearrangement would have then occurr
ed at an early postzygotic stage whereby a segment of the paternal chr
omosome 16 was translocated onto Ip. Subsequently, the paternal chromo
somes 16 and 16p- had been lost in the normal and the translocation ce
ll line, respectively. The chromosome aberration was detected secondar
y to the disclosure of maternal UPD 16 because of the demonstration of
a paternal band at several loci on distal 16p. This case shows that c
hromosome aberrations may be formed in a more complicated manner than
primarily assumed. Hence, the phenotype might also be due to underlyin
g factors such as UPD or undetected mosaicism in additon to the more o
bvious implications of the chromosome rearrangement itself (e.g., part
ial trisomy).