The study of working memory often utilizes a delayed matching to sampl
e paradigm (DMS). Typically in the matching condition, the test and sa
mple stimuli are identical, raising the possible confound of retinotop
ic projections for the matching stimuli in contrast to the nonmatching
stimuli. In the present study, 65 healthy subjects performed a modifi
ed delayed matching to sample task while monitoring their ERP waveform
s. The stimuli consisted of 60 different sample stimuli (S1) and 60 di
fferent test stimuli (S2). Half of the S2s were complementary to the s
ample stimuli (Fit) the other half of the S2s were not complementary (
Nonfit). After 52, the subjects pressed one of the buttons to indicate
whether the test stimulus fits the sample stimulus. Our statistical r
esults indicated that the ERPs to sample stimuli differed from the ERP
s to test stimuli from 200 ms poststimulus to the end of the recording
epoch. The ERPs to fitting stimuli were significantly different from
those to non-fitting stimuli from 200 to 400 ms poststimulus. The ERP
patterns in the present study may reflect ERP mnemonic effect for work
ing memory. Our results ruled out the retinotopic confound as a potent
ial mediator variable, and are in agreement with other animal or human
neurophysiological studies on memory. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Irela
nd Ltd.