Ck. Randall et Tr. Zentall, WIN-STAY LOSE-SHIFT AND WIN-SHIFT/LOSE-STAY LEARNING BY PIGEONS IN THE ABSENCE OF OVERT RESPONSE MEDIATION/, Behavioural processes, 41(3), 1997, pp. 227-236
Win-stay/lose-shift and win-shift/lose-stay behavior in pigeons was co
mpared using a two-alternative conditional discrimination for which th
e number of trials involving each of the task components could be prec
isely controlled. One group was rewarded for pecking the location just
pecked if those pecks were followed by food and for pecking the other
location if those pecks were not followed by food (win-stay/lose-shif
t). Another group was rewarded for pecking the location just pecked if
those pecks were not followed by food and for pecking the other locat
ion if those pecks were followed by food (win-shift/lose-stay). With i
ncreasing delay to comparison choice, pigeons were more accurate on tr
ials when initial pecking was followed by the absence of food than by
food (Experiment 1). However, when hypothesized overt response mediati
on was discouraged (Experiment 2), a win-stay superiority effect emerg
ed with increasing delay to comparison choice. Thus, unlike rats, pige
ons may be somewhat predisposed to repeat a response to a location to
which responses have been previously rewarded. (C) 1997 Elsevier Scien
ce B.V.