Wd. Irish et al., MEASURING BIAS IN UNCONTROLLED BRAIN-TUMOR TRIALS - TO RANDOMIZE OR NOT TO RANDOMIZE, Canadian journal of neurological sciences, 24(4), 1997, pp. 307-312
Purpose: To help investigators decide if new therapies for glioma warr
ant definitive evaluation in randomized studies we have been developin
g a method for assessing the degree to which patient selection may hav
e enhanced the results of uncontrolled treatment trials. In this study
, we analyzed the impact of case selection on the survival of patients
with malignant glioma receiving adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery, a
promising therapy reserved for those with small tumors and good perfo
rmance status. Methods: Following published eligibility criteria we si
mulated the patient selection process for stereotactic radiosurgery gi
ven as a boost at the conclusion of conventional radiotherapy. Eligibl
e patients were culled from a pre-existing clinical/imaging database o
f 101 consecutive conventionally-treated patients with biopsy-proven m
alignant glioma and known survival times. Median durations of survival
and 2- and 3-year survival rates were determined for those judged eli
gible or ineligible for stereotactic radiosurgery, Results: Twenty-sev
en percent of patients were deemed eligible for stereotactic radiosurg
ery, eligible patients had more favorable prognostic factors and signi
ficantly longer median survival than ineligible patients (23.4 vs. 8.6
months; 2-year rate, 48% vs. 15%; 3-year rate, 30% vs, 7%); eligible
patients also had a longer median survival than the entire group of un
selected patients (23.4 vs. 11.4 months). Radiosurgery-eligible, conve
ntionally-treated patients with glioblastoma multiforme and a group of
radiosurgery-treated patients at a special referral center had simila
r median survival times (16.4 vs. 19.7 months), Conclusion: We provide
additional evidence for selection bias in uncontrolled trials of ster
eotactic radiosurgery and by simulating the selection process accurate
ly have detected a larger bias effect than noted previously. Judging f
rom experience with interstitial radiation and intraarterial chemother
apy where substantial selection bias also occurred and randomized cont
rolled trials proved disappointing, we conclude that a phase HI study
of stereotactic radiosurgery for malignant glioma is unlikely to yield
a positive result and may not be necessary.