M. Okazaki et al., CROSS-REACTIVITY OF TDX AND OPUS IMMUNOASSAY SYSTEMS FOR SERUM DIGOXIN DETERMINATION, Therapeutic drug monitoring, 19(6), 1997, pp. 657-662
The properties of the widely used TDX Analyzer and recently developed
OPUS Immunoassay System were compared using 403 serum specimens taken
from patients who did or did not take digoxin. Of the 210 specimens fr
om patients not treated with digoxin, a false-positive digoxin concent
ration was detected in 15 specimens (7%) by TDX and in only 2 specimen
s (1%) by OPUS because of the cross-reactivity with structurally simil
ar drugs. Potassium canrenoate, digitoxin, deslanoside, and methyldigo
xin exhibited masked concentration-dependent cross-reactivity in the T
DX assay method, whereas deslanoside and methyldigoxin only showed cro
ss-reactivity with the antibody used in the OPUS method. Although a po
or correlation was observed between these two methods for the determin
ation of 193 samples from patients treated with digoxin, the correlati
on was remarkably improved (r = 0.914) and the slope approximated unit
y when excluded the data from patients who were treated concurrently w
ith the cross-reactive compounds. Tn routine TDM of digoxin, the autho
rs experienced two cases in which cross-reactivity of the assay system
caused a clinical problem. Concurrent administration of intravenous c
anrenoate apparently interfered with the digoxin assay by TDX, but thi
s problem was solved by using the OPUS system. The authors found OPUS
more useful for monitoring serum digoxin concentrations in patients be
cause of its superior specificity.