HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY AS A REFERENCE FOR ANALYSIS OF TACROLIMUS TO ASSESS 2 IMMUNOASSAYS IN PATIENTS WITH LIVER AND RENAL-TRANSPLANTS

Citation
P. Salm et al., HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY AS A REFERENCE FOR ANALYSIS OF TACROLIMUS TO ASSESS 2 IMMUNOASSAYS IN PATIENTS WITH LIVER AND RENAL-TRANSPLANTS, Therapeutic drug monitoring, 19(6), 1997, pp. 694-700
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath",Toxicology,Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01634356
Volume
19
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
694 - 700
Database
ISI
SICI code
0163-4356(1997)19:6<694:HLTMAA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
The accuracy and imprecision of three assays used for therapeutic moni toring of tacrolimus were tested using blood-containing weighed-in amo unts of the drug, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a micr oparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA I), and a high-performance liquid c hromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS2) assay. Accuracy was acceptable for the HPLC-MS' assay al all concentrations tested (<10% d eviation) and for the ELISA at 1.0 and 4.0 mu g/l. Accuracy was not ac ceptable for the ELISA at IS,15.0 and 50.0 mu g/l or for the MEIA I at all concentrations tested. Imprecision was acceptable for the HPLC-MS 2 assay at all concentrations tested (coefficient of variation < 10%), for the ELISA at 15.0 and 50.0 mu g%l, and for the MEIA I al 15.0 and 50.0 mu g/l. Imprecision was not acceptable for the ELISA at 1.0 and 4.0 mu g/l or for the MEIA I at 1.0 and 4.0 mu g/l. This assessment wi th weighed-in amounts of tacrolimus verified the HPLC-MS2 assay as a r eference method. The performance of the two immunoassays? with HPLC-MS 2 was then compared in the clinical setting using blood from patients with; liver(n = 30) and renal (n = 37) transplants. In the liver trans plant group (127 samples), the range. of tacrolimus concentrations mea sured by HPLC-MS2, ELISA, and MEIA I was 1.9 to 31.8, 2.1 to 35.0, and less than 0.1 to 36.5, mg/l, respectively, In tile renal transplant g roup (129 samples), the ranges were;ere 1.7 to 26.1, 1.9 to 24.4, and 0.9 to 28.5 mu g/l, respectively. Compared with the HPLC-MS2, the ELIS A had minimal bias (0.1 to 0.2 mu g/l) but unacceptable variability in values (SD > 13%), The MEIA I had unacceptable bias (1.7-1.8 mu g/l) and variability (SD > 23%). These data indicated that neither the ELIS A nor MEIA I is interchangeable with HPLC-MS2., Moreover, in view of t he current trend to reduce the therapeutic dose of tacrolimus, quantit ative results using the MEIA I would not be obtainable during therapeu tic drug monitoring in some patients in whom effective therapeutic con centrations can be less than 5.0 mu g/l.