INTERACTION BETWEEN ANESTHETICS AND THE SODIUM-HYDROGEN EXCHANGE INHIBITOR HOE-642 (CARIPORIDE) IN ISCHEMIC AND REPERFUSED RAT HEARTS

Citation
S. Mathur et M. Karmazyn, INTERACTION BETWEEN ANESTHETICS AND THE SODIUM-HYDROGEN EXCHANGE INHIBITOR HOE-642 (CARIPORIDE) IN ISCHEMIC AND REPERFUSED RAT HEARTS, Anesthesiology, 87(6), 1997, pp. 1460-1469
Citations number
34
Journal title
ISSN journal
00033022
Volume
87
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1460 - 1469
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(1997)87:6<1460:IBAATS>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Background: Sodium (Na+)-hydrogen (H+) exchange (NHE) inhibitors are e ffective cardioprotective agents. The potent NHE inhibitor HOE 642 (ca riporide) is being evaluated clinically in high-risk patients, includi ng those having coronary artery bypass. Volatile anesthetics are also cardioprotective, most likely via different mechanisms. The potential interaction between anesthetics and HOE 642 was investigated. Methods: Electrically paced isolated rat hearts were perfused at constant flow . Left ventricular developed pressure and end-diastolic pressure were monitored as determinants of function. Hearts were subjected to 60 min each of total ischemia followed by reperfusion. Isoflurane (0.93 mini mum alveolar concentration [MAC]), sevoflurane (1.03 MAC), or sufentan il (1.2 nM) was added 15 min before ischemia and throughout reperfusio n, either alone or in combination with HOE 642 (5 mu M). The effect of HOE 642 alone was also studied. At the end of reperfusion, hearts wer e freeze-clamped for subsequent determination of tissue metabolites. R esults: In control hearts, left ventricular developed pressure recover ed to 40% of preischemia values, whereas left ventricular end-diastoli c pressure increased by 650% after reperfusion. Sevoflurane, isofluran e, or HOE 642 alone significantly enhanced left ventricular developed pressure recovery to more than 90%, although recovery with HOE 642 was more rapid and accompanied by significantly reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. HOE 642 plus volatile anesthetics produced add itive effects, with left ventricular developed pressure recovering by more that 100%, although left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was n ot further reduced. Sufentanil had no effect in terms of developed pre ssure, but protection with HOE 642 was maintained. HOE 642 with or wit hout volatile anesthetics also preserved adenosine triphosphate levels . Conclusions: Isoflurane, sevoflurane, and HOE 642 enhance ventricula r recovery, but the effect of HOE 642 is also associated with reduced contracture and adenosine triphosphate preservation. A combination of the NHE inhibitor and either volatile agent confers additive and super ior protection, which could be relevant for the establishment of ideal cardioprotective strategies during surgery.