MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS OF EXTENDED CALVING INTERVALS WITH USE OF BOVINE SOMATOTROPIN

Citation
Me. Vanamburgh et al., MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS OF EXTENDED CALVING INTERVALS WITH USE OF BOVINE SOMATOTROPIN, Livestock production science, 50(1-2), 1997, pp. 15-28
Citations number
29
ISSN journal
03016226
Volume
50
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
15 - 28
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-6226(1997)50:1-2<15:MAEOEC>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate a reproductive manageme nt strategy that optimized profitability per cow per day of productive life when bovine somatotropin (bST) was used. Nine herds were involve d with a portion of animals randomly assigned to one of four treatment s: breeding at first oestrus after 60 days in milk (DIM, 13.2-month ca lving interval (CI)); breeding at first oestrus after 150 days in milk (16.5-month calving interval); first lactation animals never re-bred; and second lactation animals never re-bred. All herdmates not assigne d to the study served as controls. All treatment animals received bST commencing at 63 days after parturition. Effects of bST supplementatio n with delayed pregnancy and without pregnancy were determined using t he Test Day Model(C) (TDM). Results indicated that with bST use a 16.5 -month calving interval increased (P < 0.05) milk yield over animals m anaged for a 13.2-month calving interval. Milk yield response to bST i ncreased as lactation progressed, leading to a significant increase in persistency. When days of productive life were standardized to 4.35 y rs as the typical life cycle and a calving interval of 16.5 months was used, milk was increased 4468 kg for the animals with the extended ca lving interval compared with a 13.2-month calving interval. Profitabil ity was increased by approximately US$0.75 per day per animal for anim als on a 16.5-month calving interval as compared to a 13.2-month calvi ng interval. On a herd basis, through two years of study, extended cal ving interval resulted to fewer calvings, lower incidence of postpartu m metabolic diseases, lower veterinary costs, less culling with fewer replacements needed, and an overall improvement in herd life, animal w ell-being and dairy farm profitability. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.