AXILLARY BRACHIAL-PLEXUS BLOCKADE FOR THE REFLEX SYMPATHETIC DYSTROPHY SYNDROME

Citation
Gm. Ribbers et al., AXILLARY BRACHIAL-PLEXUS BLOCKADE FOR THE REFLEX SYMPATHETIC DYSTROPHY SYNDROME, International journal of rehabilitation research, 20(4), 1997, pp. 371-380
Citations number
26
ISSN journal
03425282
Volume
20
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
371 - 380
Database
ISI
SICI code
0342-5282(1997)20:4<371:ABBFTR>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
The reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome (RSD) is a neurogenic pain s yndrome that is characterized by pain, vasomotor and dystrohic changes and often motor impairments. Although the exact pathogenesis of RSD i s unknown, for long the sympathetic nervous system was thought to play a dominant role and pharmacological and surgical sympathectomies have been a mainstay in treatment procedures. However, there is growing ev idence of a pivotal role of C-and A delta-fibres in the aetiology of R SD. These fibres subserve a dual sensory-effector function. Besides th e initiation of afferent impulses, they release neuropeptide mediators that cause a peripheral neurogenic inflammatory reaction and central neuroplastic reactions. Brachial plexus blockade (BPB) with local anae sthetic drugs interferes with the conduction of action potentials alon g both sympathetic efferents and the somatosensory C-and Ad-afferents and therefore seems a potential treatment modality in RSD. The aim of this study was to draw attention on this regional anaesthetic techniqu e that is not commonly used in RSD. In this study six patients with se vere RSD of an upper extremity in varying stages were treated with BPB in the multidisciplinary setting of an out-patient rehabilitation cli nic with a follow-up of 12 to 21 months. The study was not placebo con trolled. Three patients responded well. In these cases the treatment i nterval varied from 3 to 6 months, one case had RSD stage 1 and the tw o others stage 2. Three patients showed poor response. In one of these patients the initial effect was good but due to an infection at the i nsertion site of the catheter BPB had to be discontinued. The other tw o poor-responders had treatment intervals of 7 and 25 months and both had stage 3 RSD. We conclude that there is theoretical and clinical su pport to further evaluate the effect of BPB as a treatment modality in the early stages of RSD.