There is little agreement about the meaning of citizenship in the rapi
dly changing social, economic and political conditions of late moderni
ty. This article examines three accounts of citizenship-state-centred,
pluralist and post-structuralist-and argues that none offers an entir
ely convincing understanding of the idea suited to the fragmented cond
itions of contemporary social politics. Instead, it is important to mo
ve away from these accounts and consider citizenship as a reflexive co
ndition of 'defensive engagement'. Citizenship becomes a variegated so
cial form concerned with the differential negotiation of social change
as social and political actors struggle to create new identities and
solidarities across a range of possible settings in an increasingly fr
actured public sphere. This interpretation has implications for our un
derstanding of social inclusion and exclusion, as the conclusion to th
is article suggests.