O. Durbec et al., LOWER-EXTREMITY DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL ILL COMATOSE OR SEDATED PATIENTS UNDERGOING FEMORAL VEINCATHETERIZATION, Critical care medicine, 25(12), 1997, pp. 1982-1985
Objectives: To determine the rate of lower extremity deep vein thrombo
sis after the use of femoral catheters in intensive care unit (ICU) co
matose or sedated adults. Results were then compared with results of p
atients undergoing superior vena cava catheterization. Design: Prospec
tive, randomized, controlled, unblinded study. Setting: A mixed medica
l/surgical ICU in a university hospital. Patients: Sixty-one comatose
or sedated patients admitted to the ICU who underwent central venous c
atheterization. Interventions: Patients were monitored for signs of th
rombotic complications. On catheter removal, a lower-extremity bilater
al phlebographic examination was performed in each patient. Measuremen
ts and Main Results: After randomization, 31 patients underwent femora
l vein catheterization and 30 patients underwent superior vena cava ca
theterization, either by axillary (21 patients) or internal jugular ve
in (10 patients) cannulation. Single lumen polyurethane catheters were
inserted for a mean duration of 7.1 +/- 4.6 (so) days in the femoral
vein group and 9.9 +/- 5.5 days in the superior vena cava group (p = N
S). No patient had clinical signs of leg venous thrombosis or pulmonar
y embolism during the study period. In each patient, lower extremity b
ilateral phlebography was performed at the time of catheter removal. L
eg phlebographies were normal in 18 (60%) patients in the femoral vein
group and 26 (84%) patients in the superior vena cava group. Fibrin s
leeves which developed around the femoral catheters were seen in seven
(23.3%) patients in the femoral vein group and in no patients in the
superior vena cava cannulation group. Three patients had femoral vein
thrombosis, two (6.6%) patients in the femoral vein group (two nonobst
ructive thromboses, adherent to the common femoral vein wall) and one
(3.0%) patient in the superior vena cava group (nonobstructive thrombo
sis which developed in the superficial femoral vein) (p = NS). Lower d
eep extremities thrombosis developed in five (16.7%) patients in the f
emoral vein group and in five (16%) patients in the superior vena cava
group (p = NS). Conclusions: Femoral vein catheterization with a poly
urethane catheter is associated with a lower rate of extremity deep ve
in thrombosis which is similar to the rate observed after superior ven
a cannulation in comatose or sedated patients. Femoral vein thrombosis
was observed at a rate of 6.6% after femoral vein cannulation and a r
ate of 3% after superior vena cava cannulation. Given the acceptable r
ate of this clinically important complication, femoral vein cannulatio
n offers an attractive alternative to insertion via the vena cava in t
he critically ill.