M. Takata et al., COUPLED VS. UNCOUPLED PERICARDIAL CONSTRAINT - EFFECTS ON CARDIAC CHAMBER INTERACTIONS, Journal of applied physiology, 83(6), 1997, pp. 1799-1813
The effects of pericardial constraint on cardiac chamber interactions
were evaluated by mathematical model analyses based on a novel concept
of coupled vs. uncoupled pericardial constraint. We hypothesized that
the nature of pericardial constraint can be classified as a ''coupled
'' constraint exerted by uniform liquid pressure or an ''uncoupled'' c
onstraint exerted by regional surface pressure. The numerical solution
of the model of atrioventricular interaction produced the characteris
tic waveforms in venous flows and right atrial/ventricular pressures i
n classical pericardial diseases. Coupled constraint accounted for the
patterns in cardiac tamponade; uncoupled constraint accounted for tho
se in constrictive pericarditis. Analytic solution of the model of ven
tricular interdependence demonstrated that coupled constraint (tampona
de) produced greater gains in ventricular interdependence, increasing
the occurrence of pulsus paradoxus, whereas uncoupled constraint (cons
triction) produced a greater effective right ventricular elastance, in
creasing the likelihood of Kussmaul's sign. Thus the concept of couple
d vs. uncoupled constraint may offer a coherent framework to understan
d the characteristic steady-state and respiratory-induced hemodynamic
events in multiple forms of pericardial diseases.