Background. The optimal management of Zenker's diverticula is controve
rsial in part because of the method of categorizing treatment success
or failure. Subjective and objective radiologic tests have been used t
o evaluate the various treatment modalities. There seems to be poor co
rrelation between subjective and objective findings, and we tested thi
s hypothesis in a group of patients undergoing one form of therapy (di
verticulectomy and cricopharyngeal myotomy [CPM]). Methods. Eighteen c
onsecutive patients underwent Zenker's diverticulectomy and CPM. Posto
perative symptoms and abnormalities detected by barium esophagrams wer
e evaluated after a mean follow-up of 30.3 months (range, 7-74 months)
. Results. Three of 18 patients (17%) complained of dysphagia (2 occas
ional and not bothersome; 1 bothersome and affecting dietary intake).
Postoperative static contrast esophagrams were interpreted without kno
wledge of the subjective symptoms. Small diverticula were identified i
n 8 patients (44%). There was poor correlation between symptoms and ob
jective radiographic abnormalities with agreement of 56% and a kappa s
tatistic of 0.23. Conclusions. Objective radiographic abnormalities ar
e far more common than subjective complaints following diverticulectom
y and CPM. Postoperative static contrast radiography is not routinely
required and may be misleading because of the poor correlation between
symptoms and radiographic findings. The value of dynamic videofluoros
copy needs to be evaluated. (C) 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.