Anemia is common in cancer patients, especially in those with more adv
anced stages of progressive tumor growth, the frequency varying on typ
e of cancer, stage and chemotherapy or radiation therapy used. The pat
hophysiology is multifactorial. However the most common anemia is the
anemia whose features are similar to those seen in other chronic disea
ses (anemia of chronic disease - ACD). The pathophysiological mechanis
ms are: a mild decrease in red blood cells survival, a decreased re-ut
ilization of bone marrow iron stores and an inadequate erythropoietin
response to the degree of anemia. When anemia cannot be corrected thro
ugh the administration of hematinics and anemia is severe enough to si
gnificantly restrict physical activity and quality of life, blood tran
sfusion is requested. It has been reported that the percentage of pati
ents requiring transfusion ranges from 20 to 50%. The transfusion of a
llogeneic blood exposes the recipient to immunological and infectious
risks. There is evidence that allogeneic blood transfusions can have i
mmunologic consequences and some argue that these immune changes can a
dversely affect the prognosis in cancer patient. Although this is stil
l controversial, until it can be shown that blood transfusion is not h
armful in the long term to patients with cancer, it seems reasonable t
o avoid it whenever possible. Recently the availability of recombinant
DNA technology permitted large scale production of recombinant human
erythropoietin (rHuEPO). To date several clinical trials employed rHuE
PO in anemic cancer patients with various solid tumors both on and off
chemotherapy. All these studies have reported a significantly increas
e in Hct than placebo in more than 50% of the treated patients. The pr
oblem of correcting anemia and of blood transfusion is even more impor
tant when cancer patients become candidate to major surgery. In such s
ituation, the transfusion of a consistent number of units is generally
required to cover the surgical blood loss. The use of homologous bloo
d in surgery can be substantially reduced by the introduction of autol
ogous blood transfusion (ABT) programmes in association with rHuEPO. A
number of experimental and clinical studies on the effects of rHuEPO
on AB donation and on erythropoiesis in the peri-operative period have
demonstrated that it resulted to be effective in stimulating erythrop
oiesis, with a consequent increase in the volume of red cells produced
during the course of treatment and in the number of units predeposite
d. It was also effective in correcting anemia induced by collection of
blood units. The efficacy of rHuEPO in increasing the volume of autol
ogous blood the patient can predeposit before surgery has been demonst
rated also in patients with ACD and cancer. No significant adverse eff
ects of rHuEPO administration have been reported in any of the studies
published to date. It can be concluded that rHuEPO therapy may be saf
e and effective in selected surgical patients, in stimulating erythrop
oiesis, in expanding the circulating RBCs mass, in increasing the volu
me of AB that can be collected pre operatively and, consequently, in r
educing the exposure to homologous blood. Therapy with rHuEPO may prov
e to be a useful addition to existing strategies of blood conservation
to minimize exposure to HB.