Background. In recent years, more and more discussions have arisen wit
h regard to the role of (partially) hydrolyzed formulas as standard fe
edings for infants with a high risk to have allergy. Methods. This rev
iew is based on an extensive overview of the literature dealing with t
he subjects of allergy prevention and hydrolyzed formulas. Results. Al
though breast-feeding should receive absolute priority in the nutritio
n of infants, the existence of artificial milk formulas as an addition
to or replacement of breast milk is a necessity. In high-risk infants
with a family history of allergy, we might consider a hypoallergenic
formula instead of the classical start formulas to reduce the risk of
allergy. From a nutritional point of view, these formulas should only
be hydrolyzed as much as necessary. On the other hand, for the treatme
nt of food allergies, the peptides of the semi-elementary infant formu
las should be as short as possible. This can, however, have an impact
on the nutritional value of the formula. Therefore, a difference is ma
de between partial and complete hydrolysates. Conclusion. While a firm
recommendation is not yet possible, physicians might consider partial
hydrolysate formulas in high-risk infants if parents can afford the h
igher-cost option.