Background and objectives. The potential risks of spinal lidocaine hav
e generated interest in an alternative local anesthetic solution, Feat
ures of anesthetic block were therefore assessed in a double-blind ran
domized prospective study following administration of spinal bupivacai
ne in small doses. Methods. Ninety patients scheduled for lower limb s
aphenous vein stripping were randomized to receive a 4-mL hyperbaric s
olution containing 4, 6, or 8 mg bupivacaine in the subarachnoid space
. Sensory and motor block and hemodynamic changes were assessed at reg
ular intervals. Patients were also questioned regarding transient radi
cular irritation symptoms. Results. The mean duration of sensory block
increased with increasing dose (duration at L2: 56 +/- 27, 71 +/- 29,
79 +/- 25 minutes in groups 4, 6, and 8 mg, respectively, P < .05). M
otor block was also dose dependent. The incidence of grade 3 motor blo
ck increased from 0%, to 21%, and to 53%. No patient had symptoms of t
ransient radicular irritation. Arterial pressure and heart rate were s
table throughout the study. Conclusion. Hyperbaric bupivacaine 6-8 mg
provides a suitable alternative to spinal lidocaine for surgical proce
dures of short duration.