INCIDENCE OF GENITOFEMORAL NERVE BLOCK DURING LUMBAR SYMPATHETIC BLOCK - COMPARISON OF 2 LUMBAR INJECTION SITES

Citation
Sc. Sayson et al., INCIDENCE OF GENITOFEMORAL NERVE BLOCK DURING LUMBAR SYMPATHETIC BLOCK - COMPARISON OF 2 LUMBAR INJECTION SITES, Regional anesthesia, 22(6), 1997, pp. 569-574
Citations number
17
Journal title
ISSN journal
10987339
Volume
22
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
569 - 574
Database
ISI
SICI code
1098-7339(1997)22:6<569:IOGNBD>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Background and Objectives. Genitofemoral nerve (GFN) block is a known side effect of a lumbar sympathetic block (LSB), although the incidenc e has not been well documented. Furthermore, genitofemoral neuralgia c an occur following neurolytic LSB (1). Because the level at which the GFN exits the psoas sheath varies, this study was designed to identify differences in the incidence of GFN block following LSB at the level of the second versus the fourth lumbar vertebrae. Methods. Patients re quiring LSB to evaluate chronic lower extremity pain were prospectivel y studied. Patients were injected at the second lumbar (L2 group) or f ourth lumbar (L4 group) vertebral body depending on the location of th e pain syndrome in the lower extremity. Lumbar sympathetic blocks were performed using 10 mL of a 0.5% bupivacaine solution with radiocontra st; spread of injectate was verified using fluoroscopy. An observer ev aluating for presence of GFN block was blinded to the lumbar level of injection. Results. Thirty patients were enrolled (L2 group, n = 15; L 4 group, n = 15). Spread of local anesthetic/radiocontrast solution wa s limited to approximately one vertebral body above and one below the target level. There was no difference in the ability to achieve a LSB; success rates were 66% and 73% using L2 and L4, respectively. The inc idence of GFN block was 0% (0/15) in the L2 group versus 40% (6/15) in the L4 group; this was statistically significant (P = .017, Fisher's exact test). Conclusions. The GFN is less likely to be blocked when th e LSB is performed near the second lumbar vertebra as compared with th e fourth lumbar vertebra.