COMPARISON OF ANTIBODY DIRECT EPIFLUORESCENT FILTER TECHNIQUE WITH THE MOST PROBABLE NUMBER PROCEDURE FOR RAPID ENUMERATION OF LISTERIA IN FRESH VEGETABLES
Ml. Tortorello et al., COMPARISON OF ANTIBODY DIRECT EPIFLUORESCENT FILTER TECHNIQUE WITH THE MOST PROBABLE NUMBER PROCEDURE FOR RAPID ENUMERATION OF LISTERIA IN FRESH VEGETABLES, Journal of AOAC International, 80(6), 1997, pp. 1208-1214
The antibody-direct epifluorescent filter (Ab-DEFT) technique was eval
uated as a rapid alternative to the most probable number (MPN) method
for enumeration of artificially inoculated Listeria monocytogenes in r
eady-to-eat packaged salads and other fresh vegetables. Ab-DEFT was pe
rformed by homogenization of food in mesh-lined Stomacher bags, follow
ed by prefiltration of homogenate through a 5 mu m pore nylon filter,
and passage of filtrate through a 0.4 mu m pore black polycarbonate fi
lter to collect and concentrate Listeria cells. After cells were stain
ed with a fluorochrome-labeled polyclonal antibody to Listeria, the fi
lter surface was examined by epifluorescence microscopy, and fluoresce
nt cells were counted. A 3-tube MPN procedure was performed by success
ive enrichments of homogenized foods in Listeria enrichment and Fraser
broths, followed by selective plating. Ab-DEFT provided quantitative
determinations of Listeria cells that correlated with plate counts and
MPN estimates in a linear response over a range of cell concentration
s from 10 to 10(7) colony forming units (CFU)/mL. Microbial background
s as high as 10(8) CFU/mL did not affect performance of Ab-DEFT. In co
ntrast to the MPN method, which required 5 days to perform, quantitati
on by Ab-DEFT could be completed in less than 1 h. Despite cross-react
ivities demonstrated by the polyclonal fluorescent antibody, the poten
tial of Ab-DEFT as a rapid alternative to MPN for microbial cell enume
ration was evident.