Centbucridine, a recent anesthetic agent, has been shown to be effecti
ve for topical ocular anesthesia. However, its value has yet to be est
ablished for ophthalmic local anesthesia. Through a double-masked, ran
domized study of 60 microsurgeries for the treatment of cataract, the
authors graded and compared the efficacy of a facial nerve block with
0.5% centbucridine versus 2% lidocaine hydrochloride. (The topical as
well as retrobulbar anesthesia was achieved with lidocaine.) Excluding
the 7 cases that were graded as having a ''poor'' block, the authors
noted ''good'' orbicularis oculi muscle response in 21 of 24 patients
who were given lidocaine, compared with 26 of 29 patients who were giv
en centbucridine. Both agents provided an acceptable nerve block for a
t least 60 minutes; however, the effect of lidocaine was found to have
an earlier onset (P<.001). Side effects were not observed with either
anesthetic, The findings of this study indicate that centbucridine se
ems to be a satisfactory agent as an injectable or topical anesthesia
for ophthalmic microsurgery.