Study objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety
and efficacy of nebulized lidocaine hydrochloride as a topical anesth
etic for use during flexible bronchoscopy in infants and children. Des
ign: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients:
Twenty consecutive patients scheduled for flexible bronchoscopy who w
ere not intubated and had no known cardiac or hepatic disease comprise
d the study group. Interventions: The patients were randomized to rece
ive either 8 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg of nebulized 2% lidocaine by face mask p
rior to bronchoscopy. Setting: The study took place in a bronchoscopy
suite at an academic medical center. Measurements: To determine system
ic absorption, serum lidocaine levels were obtained. To assess efficac
y of nebulized lidocaine as a topical anesthetic, changes in heart rat
e and blood pressure were recorded, and the bronchoscopist (mho did no
t know the lidocaine dose used) rated the ease of passage of the bronc
hoscope through nose, vocal cords, trachea, bronchi, and all sites ove
rall, and the degree of cough. Results: Nebulized lidocaine was safe,
was well-tolerated, and provided adequate anesthesia for half of the p
atients. The serum lidocaine levels were much lower than the levels in
the toxic range. There was a trend toward easier passage of the bronc
hoscope in the high-dose group at all sites noted previously that were
evaluated. Conclusion: Nebulized lidocaine in doses up to 8 mg/kg app
ears to be safe and moderately effective as a topical anesthetic for f
lexible bronchoscopy in infants and children. The serum levels were re
markably low. Fifty percent of the subjects required no supplemental l
idocaine.