Sv. Stager et Sl. Ludlow, THE EFFECTS OF FLUENCY-EVOKING CONDITIONS ON VOICING ONSET TYPES IN PERSONS WHO DO AND DO NOT STUTTER, Journal of communication disorders, 31(1), 1998, pp. 33-52
Voicing onset changes between control conditions and three fluency-evo
king conditions (choral reading [CHORAL], delayed auditory feedback [D
AF], and noise [NOISE]) were studied in 12 persons who do not stutter
and 10 who do stutter. Voicing onsets were distinguished physiological
ly using airflow prior to voicing, with zero airflow prevoicing catego
rized as hard and the rest as breathy. Persons who stutter were more f
luent under all fluency-evoking conditions than control conditions. Sp
eaking under fluency-evoking conditions did not significantly increase
the overall proportion of breathy onsets from control conditions for
either group. However, looking only at hard onsets in the control cond
ition, we found that both groups changed significantly more to breathy
(p = 0.001) under CHORAL and NOISE. In persons who stutter, onset typ
e was not associated with whether a word was produced fluently or dysf
luently in the control condition. Also, no relationship was found betw
een onsets changing to breathy under fluency-evoking conditions and on
sets changing to fluent. The results suggest that although fluency-evo
king conditions can modify some voicing onset behaviors, these modific
ations do not relate to improvements in fluency. Published by Elsevier
Science Inc.