An indivisible object is to be procured through bidding from one of tw
o prospective suppliers. Firms decide whether to invest in cost-reduct
ion before the bidding. The procurer commits to a mechanism ahead of i
nvestment decisions by firms. If the procurer can charge entry fees th
at may be discriminatory, a sealed-bid second-price auction uniquely i
mplements the first-best outcome and is optimal for the buyer. 'Revenu
e Equivalence' holds when first-best investments are symmetric; howeve
r, it breaks down when first-best investments are asymmetric. Without
entry fees, the procurer may want to bid-discriminate between ex-ante
identical firms to induce the favored firm to invest and become strong
while the unfavored firm not to invest and stay weak. This result run
s counter to the earlier findings on discrimination in procurement auc
tions without pre-contract R&D: the principal favors the weaker agent
to induce stronger bid competition. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.