The purpose of this study was to evaluate a cadence curl-up, test in a
college population as compared to the American Alliance for Health, P
hysical Education, Recreation and Dance (AAHPERD) 1-min sit-up test (A
ssociation for Research and Professional Councils and Societies, 1985)
and the Robertson 1-min curl-up test (Robertson & Magnusdottir, 1987)
. A cadence curl-up test, referred to as the GT curl-up test, was set
at 25 repetitions per minute. A total of 205 college students complete
d three trials consisting of one AAHPERD sit-up trial and two GT curl-
zip trials. A subsample (n = 85) completed the Robertson curl-up test
as a fourth trial. Trials were counterbalanced with 7 days rest betwee
n each test. To evaluate content validity, electromyography signals fr
om selected muscle sites were measured on 6 participants for each of t
he three tests. Mean scores and standard deviations for the GT curl-up
test, AAHPERD sit-up lest, and Robertson curl-up test were M = 46.2,
SD = 17.8; M = 46.4, SD = 10.2; and M = 69.7, SD = 14.1), respectively
. Pearson product moment correlations among the three tests were low t
o moderate (r less than or equal to .50). The intraclass correlation r
eliability estimate for the GT curl-up test was 0.92. In 1-min speed t
ests, repeated rapid trunk flexion can adversely affect technique and
has raised safety concerns (Jette, Sidney & Cicutti, 1984; Faulkner; S
prigings, McQuarrie, & Bell, 1989; Cooper Institute for Aerobics Resea
rch, 1994). The Robertson test also requires the use of a curl-up fram
e. In the GT cadence test these drawbacks are minimized due to a slowe
r, more controlled movement with an objective endpoint that is not dep
endent on special equipment. Moreover, our EMG findings supported prev
ious reports that curl-up exercise with feet unanchored minimizes rect
us femoris involvement. Based on the results of tills study, the GT cu
rl-up test was found to be a reliable field test with logical validity
supporting its relevance as an index of abdominal muscular endurance
among college students.