This paper contrasts two prominent positions in contemporary Western f
eminist discourse about prostitution The first is radical feminism, wh
ich emerged in the early 1970s; the second is libertarian feminism, wh
ich emerged in the late 1980s. The paper analyses the underlying assum
ptions and public policy recommendation of each position; it argues th
at each illuminates important aspens of the situations of some prostit
utes but ignores or denies others. An approach to prostitution capable
oi providing an adequate guide to public policy must be less dogmatic
or ''essentialist'' than either radical or libertarian feminism; it s
hould investigate how the sex trade operates in specific locations and
the varying meanings it has in different cultural contexts. Such inve
stigations must be feminist not only in their commitment to ending the
subordination of women but also in their respect for choices made by
women who already must often endure not only exploitation but also sti
gmatization, discrimination and exclusion. In this paper, I sketch two
prominent positions in contemporary Western feminist discourse about
prostitution, discuss the strengths and inadequacies of each, and conc
lude by indicating an approach - as opposed to a substantive analysis
- that I find more promising.