SELECTION FOR IMIDACLOPRID RESISTANCE IN SILVERLEAF WHITEFLIES FROM THE IMPERIAL-VALLEY AND DEVELOPMENT OF A HYDROPONIC BIOASSAY FOR RESISTANCE MONITORING
N. Prabhaker et al., SELECTION FOR IMIDACLOPRID RESISTANCE IN SILVERLEAF WHITEFLIES FROM THE IMPERIAL-VALLEY AND DEVELOPMENT OF A HYDROPONIC BIOASSAY FOR RESISTANCE MONITORING, Pesticide science, 51(4), 1997, pp. 419-428
A field-collected population of the silver leaf whitefly, Bemisia arge
nti-folii, was selected with the nicotinyl compound, imidacloprid, ove
r 32 generations to determine if resistance would develop when maintai
ned under continuous selection pressure in a greenhouse. Resistance wa
s slow to increase at first with low to moderate levels of resistance
(RR from 6- to 17-fold) in the first 15 generations of selection. Furt
her selection steadily led to higher levels of resistance, with the gr
eatest resistance ratio at 82-fold, the gradual rise suggesting the in
volvement of a polygenic system. At the end of the selection, slopes o
f probit regressions were substantially steeper than earlier, indicati
ng increased homogeneity of imidacloprid resistance in this strain. A
hydroponic bioassay featuring systemic uptake of imidacloprid through
roots was developed to monitor the changes in resistance to imidaclopr
id in the selected whitefly strain and in seven field-collected strain
s from Imperial Valley, California. Six out of seven field-collected s
trains exhibited low LC50 values (0.002 to 0.512 mg ml(-1)) compared t
o the selected resistant strain, with one exception where the LC50 was
0.926 mg ml(-1) (RR=15.0). Variation in responses to imidacloprid in
the field strains suggest that this technique is sufficiently sensitiv
e to detect differences in susceptibilities of whitefly populations. T
he imidacloprid-resistant strain showed no cross-resistance to endosul
fan, chlorpyrifos or methomyl (RR ranging from 0.4- to 15-fold). A low
level of cross-resistance was observed to bifenthrin in the IM-R stra
in at 7-fold. The success of selection for resistance to imidacloprid
has serious implications for whitefly control programs that rely heavi
ly on imidacloprid.