CUTTING SETON FOR ANAL FISTULAS - HIGH-RISK OF MINOR CONTROL DEFECTS

Citation
Kpj. Hamalainen et Ap. Sainio, CUTTING SETON FOR ANAL FISTULAS - HIGH-RISK OF MINOR CONTROL DEFECTS, Diseases of the colon & rectum, 40(12), 1997, pp. 1443-1446
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology",Surgery
ISSN journal
00123706
Volume
40
Issue
12
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1443 - 1446
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3706(1997)40:12<1443:CSFAF->2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
PURPOSE: Long-term results of cutting seton in the treatment of anal f istulas were studied. METHODS: Of the 44 patients with anal fistulas, mainly of the high variety, managed with this method, 35 (25 men) atte nded a clinical and manometric follow-up examination on average 70 (ra nge, 28-184) months after operation. Fistula distribution was high tra nssphincteric (25), low transsphincteric (5), extrasphincteric (3), an d suprasphincteric (2). The seton was tightened at one-week to two-wee k intervals to achieve gradual sphincter division. RESULTS: Time requi red to achieve complete fistula healing ranged from 37 to 557 (mean, 1 51) days. Two (6 percent) of the 35 patients re-examined had recurrenc e of fistula and 22 (63 percent) reported symptoms of minor impairment in anal control, which in four patients had existed already before op eration. Anal resting pressures were similar for defective and normal control, but other manometric variables were inferior in incontinence, although total squeeze pressure only showed statistically significant difference from normal continence (P = 0.0345). Incontinence was like ly associated with hard and gutter-shaped operation scars in the anal canal, but the difference from normal continence was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Cutting seton yields fairly good results in regard to cure of fistula, but the risk of anal incontinence, despite its minor degree, seems to be too high to recommend its routine use fo r all high fistulas. The suprasphincteric fistulas and some extrasphin cteric fistulas are difficult to treat otherwise, but especially for h igh transsphincteric fistulas, other methods of treatment (preferably those in which sphincter division can be avoided and the risk of anal canal deformity and incontinence are minimized) are advocated.