Kpj. Hamalainen et Ap. Sainio, CUTTING SETON FOR ANAL FISTULAS - HIGH-RISK OF MINOR CONTROL DEFECTS, Diseases of the colon & rectum, 40(12), 1997, pp. 1443-1446
PURPOSE: Long-term results of cutting seton in the treatment of anal f
istulas were studied. METHODS: Of the 44 patients with anal fistulas,
mainly of the high variety, managed with this method, 35 (25 men) atte
nded a clinical and manometric follow-up examination on average 70 (ra
nge, 28-184) months after operation. Fistula distribution was high tra
nssphincteric (25), low transsphincteric (5), extrasphincteric (3), an
d suprasphincteric (2). The seton was tightened at one-week to two-wee
k intervals to achieve gradual sphincter division. RESULTS: Time requi
red to achieve complete fistula healing ranged from 37 to 557 (mean, 1
51) days. Two (6 percent) of the 35 patients re-examined had recurrenc
e of fistula and 22 (63 percent) reported symptoms of minor impairment
in anal control, which in four patients had existed already before op
eration. Anal resting pressures were similar for defective and normal
control, but other manometric variables were inferior in incontinence,
although total squeeze pressure only showed statistically significant
difference from normal continence (P = 0.0345). Incontinence was like
ly associated with hard and gutter-shaped operation scars in the anal
canal, but the difference from normal continence was not statistically
significant. CONCLUSION: Cutting seton yields fairly good results in
regard to cure of fistula, but the risk of anal incontinence, despite
its minor degree, seems to be too high to recommend its routine use fo
r all high fistulas. The suprasphincteric fistulas and some extrasphin
cteric fistulas are difficult to treat otherwise, but especially for h
igh transsphincteric fistulas, other methods of treatment (preferably
those in which sphincter division can be avoided and the risk of anal
canal deformity and incontinence are minimized) are advocated.