SONOLUMINESCENCE FROM AQUEOUS ALCOHOL AND SURFACTANT SOLUTIONS

Citation
M. Ashokkumar et al., SONOLUMINESCENCE FROM AQUEOUS ALCOHOL AND SURFACTANT SOLUTIONS, JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 101(50), 1997, pp. 10845-10850
Citations number
24
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
ISSN journal
15206106 → ACNP
Volume
101
Issue
50
Year of publication
1997
Pages
10845 - 10850
Database
ISI
SICI code
1089-5647(1997)101:50<10845:SFAAAS>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
The sonoluminescence generated in water with pulsed 515 kHz ultrasound has been studied in the presence of different chain length (C-1-C-5) aliphatic alcohols and the surfactants sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), d odecyltrimethylammonium chloride (DTAC), and -dodecyl-N,N-dimethyl-3-a mmonio-1-propanesulfonate (DAPS). The ultrasound pulse widths used ran ged from 1 to 10 ms, with duty cycles (on/off ratios) of 1:3 to 1:9. I t was found that the sonoluminescence from the initial pulses was very low but increased in intensity and reached a maximum after 20-50 puls es, for all systems studied, depending on the purse width and duty cyc le. In the presence of alcohol the maximum signal decreased with incre asing alcohol concentration, and the signal decline was more pronounce d with increasing chain length of the alcohol. A good correlation was found to exist between the decline in the sonoluminescence signal and the Gibbs surface excess of the alcohol at the air/water interface. In the presence of SDS (an anionic surfactant) and DTAC (a cationic surf actant), quite different behavior was observed. At low concentrations of these two surfactants the maximum signal was significantly enhanced over that obtained in pure water, reaching a maximum at about 1 mM of surfactant. At higher concentrations the signal decreased again reach ing a limiting value similar to that obtained in pure water. The sonol uminescence signal in DAPS (a zwitterionic surfactant) solutions remai ned much the same as in pure water. On the addition of 0.1 M NaCl to t he three different types of surfactin solutions, the intensities of th e emission signals obtained were essentially the same as in pure water . Possible mechanisms responsible for the different behavior in the so noluminescence signal in the presence of the alcohols and surfactants are discussed.