We examined whether image analysis could separate leafy spurge from ot
her plant species and objects by comparing: image analysis to the ocul
ar method of estimating cover. Image analysis was acceptably precise a
l low and medium cover levels. Image analysis was as repeatable as the
ocular method at all sites and cover revels and acceptably reliable a
t low and medium cover levels but estimated cover lower by 12 to 22% t
han the ocular method at high cover levels. The average error levels o
f image analysis and the ocular method did not differ. Estimating leaf
y spurge cover with a 10% error required only 20 quadrats when image a
nalysis was used, while twice as many quadrats were needed when cover
was measured ocularly. Image analysis was recommended as a measurement
tool because quantification was efficient, the equipment is inexpensi
ve, and the color prints provide a permanent photo record of the study
.