PELLETING OF DIET INGREDIENTS - EFFECT OF FEED PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE, DIET SELECTION AND FEED-INTAKE BEHAVIOR IN PIGLETS

Citation
Afb. Vanderpoel et al., PELLETING OF DIET INGREDIENTS - EFFECT OF FEED PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE, DIET SELECTION AND FEED-INTAKE BEHAVIOR IN PIGLETS, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 77(4-5), 1997, pp. 153-160
Citations number
10
ISSN journal
09312439
Volume
77
Issue
4-5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
153 - 160
Database
ISI
SICI code
0931-2439(1997)77:4-5<153:PODI-E>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The pre-manufacture of separate diet ingredients into pellets and subs equent mixing the different pellets to a complete feed was examined as an alternative method to the routine manufacturing procedures. The ma in objective of the study was to compare the performance of piglets fo llowing ad libitum offering of diets composed of three different pelle ts. In a growth trial, feed intake and weight gain were studied using six dietary treatments in a 3 x 2 split-plot design. Three diets were tested, a control and two experimental diets in the presence or absenc e of a feed flavour. The diets were of similar ingredient and nutrient composition but the experimental diets were composed of three separat e pellets that were either equal or differing in their net energy cont ent. Sixty cross-bred piglets [initial liveweight 30.4 (s.e. 0.54 kg)] were individually housed and fed the feeds ad libitum in the dry form once a day and in only one feed trough. No significant effects of the dietary treatments on daily gain, feed intake and feed conversion eff iciency were observed and no interaction between diet and feed flavour was found. From the design of the experiment it was not definitely cl ear that single-fed piglets selected between the different pellets as measured by the difference between the offered and consumed quantity o f pellets. Feed intake behaviour, as measured by the cumulative scores of 10 piglets during 20 days, did not differ between dietary treatmen ts or flavour. Diet selection and feed intake behaviour can only be in dicative since the trial design was inherent to the main objective of study, which was the performance response.