Agk. Edwards et S. Rollnick, OUTCOME STUDIES OF BRIEF ALCOHOL INTERVENTION IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - THE PROBLEM OF LOST SUBJECTS, Addiction, 92(12), 1997, pp. 1699-1704
Aims. To identify the attrition rate of eligible subjects from the gen
eral practice brief intervention studies, reasons for attrition, and t
he potential bias arising from lost subjects. Design. Review of all pu
blished trials of brief intervention for excessive drinkers in primary
care settings. Findings. The attrition rate of eligible subjects from
the general practice brief intervention studies ranges from 44.3 to 8
3.2% (mean 70.6%). The potential bias introduced by the characteristic
s of subjects available and not available for research is not adequate
ly addressed. Where there is evidence, subjects unavailable for study
or those lost to follow-up usually show different characteristics (e.g
. younger, heavier drinkers, less educated) from those completing the
study. Conclusions. Study populations in general practice-based brief
alcohol interventions may have been those most susceptible to interven
tion. This suggests caution is appropriate in generalizing from brief
intervention study results to routine primary care.